On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Tristam MacDonald <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Bruce Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So I think it'll improve much faster if it's reworked to be "an >> additional platform choice" and then merged into the pyglet trunk in a way >> that doesn't interfere with the Carbon implementation (nor displace it as >> the default on the Mac, for now) on any platform that supports Carbon. >> >> - Bruce Smith >> > > Sure, I didn't meant to intimate that we should chop Carbon prematurely. > Just wanted to keep in play the warning that Carbon as a platform is merely > a historical oddity, and is going to become any less dead with the passage > of time. > > -- > Tristam MacDonald > > In that case we agree completely, and (fearing for the day when I have a Mac that won't even support Carbon) I'm eager to see Cocoa get into the main pyglet development branch, so it's easier to try out and work on. - Bruce -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users?hl=en.
