On Apr 25, 8:37 am, Kurt Yoder <[email protected]> wrote: > Can someone refute him using one of these points:
Good luck with that. From past experience, if a Wikipedia editor thinks something is not notable enough, you're never going to convince them it's their ignorance that's at fault. Look at the torturous logic employed here: "Judging by the amazon pages the books discuss doing things with the software, not necessarily the software itself in a great deal of detail." So a book about _using_ a piece of software is irrelevant, what they want is a book that talks _about_ it (which is _not how software books are written_). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users?hl=en.
