On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 8:52 PM, alex23 <[email protected]> wrote: > On Apr 25, 8:37 am, Kurt Yoder <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can someone refute him using one of these points: > > Good luck with that. From past experience, if a Wikipedia editor > thinks something is not notable enough, you're never going to convince > them it's their ignorance that's at fault. > > Look at the torturous logic employed here: > > "Judging by the amazon pages the books discuss doing things with the > software, not necessarily the software itself in a great deal of > detail." > > So a book about _using_ a piece of software is irrelevant, what they > want is a book that talks _about_ it (which is _not how software books > are written_). >
On those grounds, I'm fairly sure that PyGame is also failing the notability test (despite several books with PyGame in the title). I don't have a clear picture of the way notability guidelines are enforced, but couldn't an argument be made based on the fact that there are only 2 major Python toolkits for games/graphics development, which makes de-listing one of them slightly more problematic? -- Tristam MacDonald System Administrator, Suffolk University Math & CS Department http://swiftcoder.wordpress.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users?hl=en.
