On 05/11/14 14:10, Steve Kossouho wrote: > My point was that if hg and svn are not esoteric tools, github (and > bitbucket, to some extent) is very easy to use (hence its popularity). > Yet you're right, it's probably useless. I'll try. Thanks. >
Exactly! pyglet is a complex piece of software. There are lots of things you need to know, and I can tell you that merging patches is not easy at all (specially when your domain is just one of the three supported platforms). See this: - http://pyglet.org/contribute.html - https://code.google.com/p/pyglet/wiki/RoadMap12 - https://code.google.com/p/pyglet/issues/list?q=label:1.2-release-blocker If that's a blocker for contributions, who's going to deal with (potentially) not so good pull requests just because GitHub is very easy to use? I see the benefits of being on GitHub, but it's not the solution for *every* project. If pyglet had 3-4 active developers that could handle being on GitHub, I think 1.2 would be out already and probably not because of GitHub ;) Please excuse my rant. I didn't want to discuss this again because it really doesn't matter, and also I don't want to discourage others to do what they think is better! Regards, Juan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
