I'm surprised using GL_NEAREST still isn't 100%. Any chance we could get
another screenshot, or does it just look the same? Also, are the image
dimensions a power of two? Maybe images of most sizes are padded with
black? I'm just throwing guesses at the wall here; I'm not sure what it is.
On Friday, July 10, 2015 at 3:14:12 AM UTC-4, NiBE wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot for your reply I really appreciate it.
> Well the trick works, even if the bottom thin line sometimes appears
> again, very rare and barely visible for my purpose it's fine.
> Do you have an idea how to implement the other apparent solution adding a
> blank 1 pixel at the bottom? But don't want to bother you too much you've
> been already too kind to answer my initial question :)
>
> On Thursday, July 9, 2015 at 11:00:49 PM UTC+2, magu...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> They seem to cover a number of approaches, the one suggested by
>> SwiftCoder for example I think would be like this:
>>
>> test_img = pyglet.resource.image('img.png').get_texture()
>> glTexParameteri(text_img.target, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_NEAREST)
>> glTexParameteri(text_img.target, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_NEAREST)
>>
>> self.test_sprite = pyglet.sprite.Sprite(img=test_img,x=300,y=400,
>> batch=self.main_batch)
>>
>> def update(self, dt):
>> self.test_sprite.rotation -= float(100 * dt)
>>
>>
>>
>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"pyglet-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to pyglet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to pyglet-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
