On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 07:39:17PM -0700, Christopher Lee wrote: -> OK. I now understand the problem. The bsddb module btree index is -> screwing us over: when you simply ask for an iterator, it apparently -> loads the entire index into memory.
AH-HAH! I thought this was happening with my own (non-pygr) dbs, but I never had the time to track it down... grr. -> I think the writing is on the wall: we need to get rid of all -> dependencies on bsddb. It's just not scalable. Since bsddb has been -> removed from future versions of the Python Standard Library (starting -> with 2.6), I guess we need to do this NOW rather than later. -> -> Titus, what do you think? Yes, but replace it with what... is sqlite the answer? --titus -- C. Titus Brown, [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pygr-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pygr-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
