On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 07:12:28PM -0800, Marek Szuba wrote: -> I've looked into options of implementing SSL support in pygr.Data -> XML-RPC server and I've found three ways which appear to make most -> sense. I'm posting them below along with pros and cons I have (so -> far) found, for discussion. -> -> Also, by looking at this I have come to the following conclusion: -> SimpleXMLRPCServer will likely have to go. It simply doesn't look -> extensible enough to provide all we will want our XML-RPC server to -> offer... The question is, shall we look for a replacement which will be -> as compatible with the original as possible and try to extend it as we -> go, or implement something significantly different but meant straight -> away to meet our target requirements.
First, thanks to Istvan for tracking down my blog post -- I knew I'd said something about this somewhere, but I didn't remember where :) Second, my long silence is ending... I'll post replies to a bunch of pygr stuff tomorrow, hopefully. Third, I'm skeptical that SimpleXMLRPCServer isn't extensible enough; is there a specific set of features (other than SSL support) that we need that it doesn't support? I've used it for a few different things and it does an admirable job of serving functions, which is pretty much what XML-RPC is about :). Performance could be a different issue; I don't know how fast it is. cheers, --titus --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pygr-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pygr-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
