On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 07:20:57 -0800 (PST) Istvan Albert <[email protected]> wrote:
> I recall a post by Titus on this from some time ago, here it is: > http://advogato.org/person/titus/diary/370.html I've seen the recipe he mentions in that post, indeed it was the first one I have come across. There is nothing wrong with it, one should however keep in mind the following: - it isn't threaded, meaning that only one client connection can be handled at a time; - it only handles SSL connections, meaning a separate, different server has to be launched to handle non-SSL ones; - it doesn't support authentication, which we will need (along with the possibility of either specifying methods that can only be called after successful authentication, or a more complex access-control system). All that brings me back to the question from my previous e-mail, that is - whether we should start with backward compatibility and build on top of that or start with a list of requirements and build down. -- MS --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pygr-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pygr-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
