On Feb 18, 9:38 am, "C. Titus Brown" <[email protected]> wrote:
> second, I would prefer to institute a "needs review" tag to emphasize
> that the proposed patch needs code review by someone other than the
> primary author. In other words, replace "Fixed" with "NeedsReview".
Yes, I agree. The word Fixed indicates that the matter is closed,
maybe that's why those issues pile up. And the Needs Review should
also show up on the main list.
In fact just a moment ago I made the same mistake of not understanding
why a fixed issue needs to be verified ... now you'll get two messages
about it. The chain should be something like:
New -> Accepted -> Started -> Needs Review -> Fixed
best,
Istvan
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"pygr-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/pygr-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
