On Apr 16, 2009, at 9:02 PM, C. Titus Brown wrote:
> > Hi guys, > > I spent some time this evening trying to get the BLAST tests to pass > on > lyorn (the buildbot machine) and ended up getting even more confused. > Now I can't get them to pass on any of my machines! > > I assume this is working for most people, right!? What version of > BLAST > are you all using? blastall 2.2.10 > In any case, once I get it working, I'd like to add some tests that > rely > on "canned" BLAST output, so that we can distinguish easily between > BLAST version mismatches and bugs. Yes, Marek and I came to the same conclusion that there should be two types of blast tests: 1. to exercise the invocation of blastall by seeing that a reasonable set of results come back without checking for the exact details, which can be different for different blast versions; 2. to run the parser on canned blast output files and ensure that the results match exactly with expectations. The current blast tests try to encompass both aspects in each test and are consequently far too fragile to any change in behavior in the external blast program. -- Chris --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pygr-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to pygr-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pygr-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pygr-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
