Am 17.07.2011 22:47 schrieb D'Arcy J.M. Cain:
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 21:39:12 +0200
> Christoph Zwerschke<[email protected]> wrote:
>> The 4.x branch is our backward compatible maintenance branch, therefore
>> we shouldn't push ahead so quickly here, but maybe require Py 2.4 in 4.1
>> and Py 2.5 in 4.2?
>
> OK. What about PG?
Requiring Pg 8.0 in 4.1 and 8.2 in 4.2 would be a moderate pace.
>> I suggest pushing forward to 4.1 now and thereafter creating a 4.x
>> branch in the repository, working towards 5.0 in the trunk. Some of the
>> improvements and fixes from the trunk can be backported to 4.2.
>
> Sounds like a plan. I moved the date for 4.1 though. I won't be in
> town the first half of September.
Ok, that gives us some more time. On the DB-SIG list there is now a
discussion again about a possible DB-API 3. One problem with DB-API 2 is
that it does not define clearly enough how to deal with unicode, which
is needed to properly implement a driver for Python 3. Pretty much the
same problem as with WSGI. So maybe there will be a DB-API 3 or a DB-API
2.0.1 clarifying these issues. Another reason not to rush 5.0 but to
concentrate on 4.1 first.
-- Christoph
_______________________________________________
PyGreSQL mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.vex.net/mailman/listinfo/pygresql
