The other option would be to use xmllib.py from the python1.5
distribution. It would handle a lot of these things much nicer. I
currently don't have time to investigate this further (hacking on GNOME
and other things).
If someone has the time and wants to check this out, that would be great.
It would probably be easiest to write a wrapper round the library that
spits out the same tree structure my current (broken) xml parser does.
James Henstridge.
--
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.daa.com.au/~james/
On Thu, 11 Feb 1999, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote:
>
> On 10-Feb-99 Michael Sobolev wrote:
> > It looks I found yet another bug: the xml parser in pyglade program does not
> > correctly process <, >, & and " entities while glade makes use
> > of these.
>
> The pyglade xml-parser has several limitations. It should probably
> get replaced by xmlproc (using the SAX interface), but then we have
> yet another package pygtk depends upon...
>
> ----- Markus Oberhumer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
> ----- http://wildsau.idv.uni-linz.ac.at/mfx/ -----
> ----- 5E CB 5C 85 DE AF 9E BF E9 DA 7E 6A 39 F8 CC 67 -----
>
> 3 WARPS TO URANUS
>
> To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
