James Henstridge writes:
> I will probably do a reorg like this. I am already making some changes to
> pygtk that may not be fully compatible (these will probably be made as I
> update to gtk-1.4/gnome-libs-2.0), so moving to a package layout like this
> would probably be a good idea. The current layout is quite similar to how
> things were when I first started pygtk, using python-1.4 which didn't
> support packages without ni.
Dropping python 1.4 compatibility would be a good thing here. ;)
Non-hierachical names are real problem in general: I just got bit by
javadoc understanding that if a name had a dot, it was a pacakge,
otherwise it was a filename. If I have a package name without dots
(that someone else created!) that I pass to javadoc, it thinks the
directory is a source file and tries to parse it! Ugh!
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org>
Corporation for National Research Initiatives
To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
