On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
>
> James Henstridge writes:
> > I will probably do a reorg like this. I am already making some changes to
> > pygtk that may not be fully compatible (these will probably be made as I
> > update to gtk-1.4/gnome-libs-2.0), so moving to a package layout like this
> > would probably be a good idea. The current layout is quite similar to how
> > things were when I first started pygtk, using python-1.4 which didn't
> > support packages without ni.
>
> Dropping python 1.4 compatibility would be a good thing here. ;)
> Non-hierachical names are real problem in general: I just got bit by
> javadoc understanding that if a name had a dot, it was a pacakge,
> otherwise it was a filename. If I have a package name without dots
> (that someone else created!) that I pass to javadoc, it thinks the
> directory is a source file and tries to parse it! Ugh!
>
For other reasons, the latest pygtk will not work with python-1.4, so we
may as well clean out all backward compatibility code from pygtk.
>
> -Fred
>
James.
To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
