On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Russell Nelson wrote: > I agree that a) and b) are yucky. I much prefer: > c) using `make' to re-generate the code whenever you change > the .glade file, and never otherwise change the code.
I guess... you have to rely on the generated code being good, of course, and you can't fit it into a framework like Kiwi without hacking the code generator (since the generation is monolithic, right?) I'm not too familiar with generation, but it seems a tad unflexible to me. Why _not_ libglade, btw? Take care, -- Christian Reis, Senior Engineer, Async Open Source, Brazil. http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 272 3330 | NMFL _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
