Christian Robottom Reis writes:
> On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Russell Nelson wrote:
>
> > Is there that much difference between using libglade to load a .glade
> > file versus loading a .py generated from the same .glade file?
>
> Well, you can maintain the glade file through glade throughout the
> lifetime of your product, versus either a) maintaining the python code
> that is generated (yuck) or b) re-generating the code and redoing any
> customization you've done (yuck). I guess you could work around b) but
> libglade is still cleaner IMHO.
I agree that a) and b) are yucky. I much prefer:
c) using `make' to re-generate the code whenever you change
the .glade file, and never otherwise change the code.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | It's a crime, not an act
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | of war. For my take, see:
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | http://quaker.org/crime.html
_______________________________________________
pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
