On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, James Henstridge wrote: > I think this is just a case of an API where the difficulty in wrapping > it outweighed the chance that someone might want to use it (wrapping > functions that don't use the standard GtkCallbackMarshal (gtk 1.2) or > GClosures (gtk 2.0) take a bit more effort to wrap -- not much though). > I think you two are the first to ask about that one in the lifetime of > pygtk (would have to search the archives to be sure though).
I was secretly hoping for it, but gave up a couple of weeks ago. My faith in humanity and opensource development in general would be restored if it were to suddenly appear. e _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
