On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 21:43, John Hunter wrote: > >>>>> "Cedric" == Cedric Gustin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Cedric> I quickly built pygtk-2.2 against the latest Numeric > Cedric> (23.1). Could somebody test it ? If everything is fine, I > Cedric> will enable Numeric support by default in the following > Cedric> releases. > > Cedric> > http://www.pcpm.ucl.ac.be/~gustin/win32_ports/binaries/pygtk-2.2.0-numpy.win32-py2.3.exe > > Now that's service! > > I just successfully ran all the demos that use Numeric support > beautifully. > > Is this URL stable - if so I'll update the matplotlib web page.
Actually, I was thinking about simply replacing the current pygtk-2.2.0.win32-py2.3.exe by pygtk-2.2.0-numpy.win32-py2.3.exe, implicitly adding Numeric support from now on. I guess it is better than providing two separate binaries. And I don't think it will break anything for pygtk users who did not install Numeric. What do you think ? Or maybe I should wait for pygtk-2.2.1 and provide pygtk-2.2.0-numpy.win32-py2.3.exe in the meantime ? I could also change the version tag to 2.2.0.1 but I think it can be misleading. Cedric _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
