On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 10:27:19AM +0200, dvilla wrote: > El mar, 15-06-2004 a las 09:21, Andre Marais escribi�: > > Hi all, > > > > I understand that the PyGTK list is also the place where the PyORBit > > folks live. Please correct me if I'm wrong, otherwise I need some help: > > I also think so.
It should be, but in practice the only person that has done work on PyORBit is James Henstridge, and he's been very busy (and therefore rarely on) the past months. Given that nobody's stepped up to pick up patches (I know of at least one outstanding patch in Bugzilla that would appreciate review and testing) I'd say right now it's "waiting for a maintainer". > > 3.) Is there anyone who would recommend another ORB (Other than ORBit2 > > and PyORBit) implementation to use with python in this scenario? > > PyORBit has a incompatiblity problem with no ORBit2 servers [1][2]. I > don't use other python ORBs. Sorry. You could try Duncan Grisby's omniORBpy, which has always been a very mature and featureful library. Take care, -- Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
