Christian Robottom Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 09:27:10AM -0500, Doug Quale wrote: > > There are some things we can discuss whether they should be in pygtk. > > For instance, people have considered in the past whether widget > > properties should be attributes. That would allow properties to be > > get and set directly using attribute syntax in addition to using > > get_property() and set_property(). > > There's actually a bug open for this that was considered for the freeze > but eventually left out; IÃaki wrote the patch that is up at: > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81879 > > jpe, Johan and I have commented on it -- maybe others should chime in > too. The issue I raised was "fear of namespace conflicts" that would be > introduced by this, but I think it's rather minor.
I don't actually have a strong opinion whether that change would be good, bad or indifferent, so I was hoping someone smarter than me could give some good arguments one way or the other :) _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
