El mié, 09-07-2008 a las 17:08 -0700, Mitko Haralanov escribió: > On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:41:31 -0400 > I guess it is possible for the locking to add overhead since the entire > gtk uses one master lock. > Also, are you sure that it's the locks? Have you been able to load all > 2500 images before without segfaults so you can measure the time? > The alternative would be to not use a separate thread for loading the > model. yes, I could load the images without segfaults and without locks, but just a few times, and now with the locks doesn't segfault.
I don't want to use the main thread to load the model, because it will give the sensation of a hangup application, because there are to many images, so I will have to live with the overhead produced by the locks :) thanks again. regards, -- Felipe Reyes Astorga counter.li.org #316380
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
_______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [email protected] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
