On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 08:12:37 -0700 (PDT), King <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Giovanni, > > Well I am half way done but still there are couple of things left > before I'll be able to produce something usable. > > Meanwhile I came across one more issue related to producing lsb based > bootloader. LSB based binary suffers from architecture dependency. > This means that if you create a binary on AMD64, it'll likely to > execute on the same architecture. In order to create a package that > should run on all modern > architectures(x86,ia,amd), we have to produce a binary for all > architecture. > > The concept of producing "fat" binaries is not possible because it's > something not related to LSB but ELF format.
Thanks! I don't see this as a showstopper: we could easily ship more binaries and let Build.py select the correct one. -- Giovanni Bajo :: [email protected] Develer S.r.l. :: http://www.develer.com My Blog: http://giovanni.bajo.it -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PyInstaller" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyinstaller?hl=en.
