On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 06:39:35 -0700 (PDT), King <[email protected]> wrote: > I finally able to produce lsb compatible bootloader. Currently tests > shows that it supports 23 distributions out of 36. There are some > minor issue but that can be taken care of easily. I'll send you small > doc with all the instructions in a day or two.
Great! > Next is to solve the architecture dependency of lsb binary. As you > have suggested to produce binaries for all architectures and let > build.py decided to choose the correct binary at the time of > packaging. This would surely works as it's simple by all means. > However, It would be much better if we can create a system in which we > can include all the binaries along with the package and let "main" > decide to execute the correct binary as per the architecture. > > "main" could be a simple bash/sh script. This is just a thought and I > have know idea if it'll work or not? This kind of "universal binary" (like on Mac) is unseen on Linux distributions, so I don't think PyInstaller should support it by default. Anyway, it does not need to be part of PyInstaller: you can easily create wrapper scripts that bundle two or more Pyinstaller-generated executables, if you like so. It's outside PyInstaller's scope, though. -- Giovanni Bajo :: [email protected] Develer S.r.l. :: http://www.develer.com My Blog: http://giovanni.bajo.it -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PyInstaller" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyinstaller?hl=en.
