Am 04.01.2011 18:51, schrieb Martin Zibricky:
> Do you think it could be beneficial to provide .rpm or .deb packages?
Sure, it's always good to easy users life and help them staying with
what they are used to. And even developers are used to RPMs/DEBs. They
will get them scripts in the PATH while still being able to remove all
of it easily.
> Are you willing to start with it?
That's why I'm posting :-)

We have to decide on the name of the scripts put into /usr/bin/, since
"Build.py" is not such a good name IMHO. What do you prefer:

pyiBuild
pyi-build
pyinstaller-build
pyinstallerBuild

There will be some work to be done to ease patching the pathes with in
the pyinstaller files (HOME will not be enough). But this is just a bit
of cleanup which should be done anyway.

-- 
Schönen Gruß - Regards
Hartmut Goebel
Dipl.-Informatiker (univ.), CISSP, CSSLP

Goebel Consult 
Spezialist für IT-Sicherheit in komplexen Umgebungen
http://www.goebel-consult.de

Monatliche Kolumne: http://www.cissp-gefluester.de/
Goebel Consult mit Mitglied bei http://www.7-it.de


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to