On Wednesday 21 of May 2014 20:48:41 Paul Baker wrote: > If a script does not import Unicode support, why is the default behaviour to > include it anyway? I presume there is some benefit - perhaps a situation in > which not including it could cause a problem?
It's hard to detect if there is dependency on those modules or not. In the past there were some issues with it. In general it is safe to include that. Some libraries might depend on it and you are not aware of it. In Python 3 does not make sense anymore to exclude unicode support.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
