(bcc'ing ben, brendan and david because pyjamasdev mailing list software doesn't accept cc's, sorry)
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Jeffrey Van Voorst <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't know how well (if at all) how xulrunner's version numbers > correspond with firefox's (the full fledged browser package) version > numbers. However, it is my opinion that given the change in code base > and the rapid release cycle from Mozilla, that Linux distributions > support more than 1 xulrunner package till the dust settles (if it > ever does). I think if the dust doesn't settle, most people may just > give up and look elsewhere (even if it is to a codebase that is > copyrighted by *the big bad wolf*). yeah. like the OLPC team did. debian i believe now has _five_ versions of the xulrunner library. only two of those work with hulahop (1.9 and 9) but it's too late to get hulahop with xulrunner 9 into debian: they've already moved on to 10 (which segfaults, despite no changes being made or required to the stable hulahop codebase). .... and that's just debian. l.
