On 11/04/12 18:34, lkcl luke wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Phil Charlesworth
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> http://code.google.com/p/pyjamas/issues/detail?id=715
>> I have posted Comment #3 on Issue 715 detailing a possible solution
>> along the lines of my Comment #2. If the solution is thought be be
>>
> ok, the problem with the approach you've suggested is that it now
> forces the images to be the pyjamas stock ones.... but only for pyjd.
>
> there has to be a solution which works for all cases and provides
> flexibility.
>
>
>> http://code.google.com/p/pyjamas/issues/detail?id=714
>>
> *snort* - os.path.dirname, it was that simple?? :)
>
I have posted Comments #5 and #6 on Issue 715. Comment #6 describes a
way of allowing the image path to be redirected to public/images/ (for
pyjd) or output/images/ (for pyjs) so that a set of images with the same
names and types but different content can be used by DisclosurePanel or
Tree. If this is thought to be a runner, I will supply a suitable patch.
P.
