On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Peter Bittner <[email protected]>wrote:
> Phil,
>
> > I have posted Comments #5 and #6 on Issue 715. Comment #6 describes a
> > way of allowing the image path to be redirected to public/images/ (for
> > pyjd) or output/images/ (for pyjs) so that a set of images with the same
> > names and types but different content can be used by DisclosurePanel or
> > Tree. If this is thought to be a runner, I will supply a suitable patch.
>
> Not sure if I understand the whole story, but: The ./output directory
> is supposed to be deleted. Nothing in there is supposed to be
> preserved, in no repository, anywhere. Anything that is media and
> reads "solution" must happen in the ./public directory. End of story,
> isn't it?
>
> My two cents. -- Forgive me if I missed the point.
>
> Peter
>
Peter,
Yes, you're right but the point is the public/images/ directory and its
contents get copied by pyjsbuild to output/images/, so if you place
alternative images in public/images/ and rebuild the pyjs version, the
images will be available to both pyjd and pyjs.
Hope this clarifies the point.
Phil
