On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 16:54 -0500, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Charles Law <[email protected]> wrote: > > There has to be some relationship already. For GSOC 2011, I remember > > Pyajams wasn't selected by Python was, and we got a contributor that way. > > what does it actually mean to by "officially" under a foundation, of any kind? >
OK. Here's what PSF has to say by words of Van Lindberg: <quote> It really is not in the best interest of anyone for the PSF to dictate policy. Instead, the PSF would act as a neutral ground that everyone could use to just go back to coding. I had in mind the following: - Announcement of the transfer of the pyjs name and domain to the PSF - Transfer of domain registration and DNS to the PSF registrar/nameservers - Setup of a pyjs mailman instance on python.org servers - Perhaps set up a mercurial repo to be the "official" repo, with hg+ssh access to the repo. This centralizes the disputed assets - name, code, mailing list, repo, etc, under the PSF, with PSF administration, but gives everyone enough access to code, commit, etc - and fork development, if need be. </quote>
