>> This centralizes the disputed assets - name, code, mailing list, repo, >> etc, under the PSF, with PSF administration, but gives everyone enough >> access to code, commit, etc - and fork development, if need be.
+1 (though I have personal preference for ASF, original idea came from Google GWT which itself was also under Apache license) > and I (mostly him) have also converted to website to wiki pages (to go > live tonight), which are then auto-rebuilt after each wiki update ... > would need to reconcile these things. +1 > personally i'm not too giddy about using hg, but probably i'm already +1 I am not so giddy either > i'm curious how, as arbiters, they actually resolve conflicts ... i > mean, what would have been the process, if we stepped back 3 weeks and > were already under the PSF? IMHO the change happened way to quickly. There should have been public notification and discussion on the mailing list before the change of ownership was done, with all major stakeholders including the owner of Pyjamas (Luke) and the owner of pyjs.org at the time (I forgot his name). I cannot believe any major software foundation would accept such a quick change of ownership, with no public discussion whatsoever.
