On 10/08/2013 05:23 AM, Łukasz Mach wrote:
I agree with Lex that maybe pyjs (compiler) should be separated from
pyjamas (widget library), but I also believe that widget library is
essential, and is thing which will attract more users and more developers.
I agree that a separation might be a good idea. That said,
the widget library, while useful as it is, needs work.
And additional thought: I think that pyjd is dead end. Thing which:
works on Windows, but doesn't work on Debian, works on Ubuntu but
requires downloading some library and compiling it yourself, I don't
believe any of my app users would do such things ...
Having ability to run application cross browser/desktop is very useful,
but I think it should use toolkits like Qt or wxPython (so some of
pyjamas classes would be wrappers on qt/wx classes, in desktop mode).
I completely agree with all this (had it in my message but edited it ;).
To me pyjd has been something of an "emperor's new clothes" thing --
like ... really??
Steve
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pyjs.org Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to pyjs-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
