> Committed (and README updated as well).
Excellent, I'll line this up for release shortly after the new
PyKaraoke. Thanks for your efforts, this is exactly what cdgtools needed.
> It would be "easier" to write a function that mangles 96 bytes (one
> frame's worth) at a time; then you'd just have this:
The spanner in the works is that the interleaving process spews the
bytes into adjacent sectors, so it's not a straight "96 bytes in, 96
bytes out" process. I'll have a look at the best way to wedge it in anyway.
Got it. Best then is to mangle all the data at once then and sort out how to grab 96 bytes at a time of the result for writing during the interlacing phase. Spiffy, though, glad you've got a handle on it :)
--
Looking for something to read? Visit http://willfe.com/ ... it's easy, safe, and fun for the whole family!
