> > programing to end results. I personally don't know why anyone would > > use any other python gui combo! wx,gtk,tk etc. (except for lic. > > issues) and I definitely posted this on the python list as well! > > I completely agree with you about the power of PyQt, but I can give a > reason why I probably won't use it for any of my "mainstream" code in > the near future: installation. If my code uses PyQt, then every user > must install Qt and PyQt, both of which are not entirely trivial and > require a C++ compiler, which not everybody has. Moreoever, > compatibility between versions is not perfect, not all code for Qt 2 > works with Qt 3. For any supported code, I'd rather avoid the > resulting support overhead and stick with Tk.
Since I'm a newbee........ So one, your assuming everyone has python and Tk installed already but not Qt/PyQt? Can't you compile static libs/apps with Qt/PyQt or use something like "installer" for linux or Py2exe for windows? I know this can create large files sometimes, but that hasn't been a problem on any of todays systems. I haven't got around to it yet, but was just assuming I could do something of that nature to share Qt/PyQt apps with other people that may not have it installed. Please correct me if I'm wrong. _______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mats.gmd.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
