On Wednesday 20 November 2002 7:50 pm, Tom Jenkins wrote: > Konrad Hinsen wrote: > > I completely agree with you about the power of PyQt, but I can give a > > reason why I probably won't use it for any of my "mainstream" code in > > the near future: installation. If my code uses PyQt, then every user > > must install Qt and PyQt, both of which are not entirely trivial and > > require a C++ compiler, which not everybody has. Moreoever, > > compatibility between versions is not perfect, not all code for Qt 2 > > works with Qt 3. For any supported code, I'd rather avoid the > > resulting support overhead and stick with Tk. > > ah that is a problem. i wanted to download and try this out but i don't > have a compiler for my windows box. i can play with it in KDE on Linux > but i'd like to see it on windows also. > > are there any free compilers on windows that i can use for Qt & PyQt?
If you don't want to spend money, and you are working in a "non-commercial setting", then you can use the non-commercial editions of both Qt and PyQt which are both provided as Windows binaries. Otherwise you need the commercial versions of both Qt and PyQt (and a compiler to build them with). Phil _______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mats.gmd.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde
