Are you on pylons-devel? Don't know whether to cc you. On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'll leave you to figure this out. Certainly, providing standard > > implementations for the major JS libraries would be a good thing. > > Implementations or documented examples? If I left the implementations in > then we would still have framework-dependent Javascript code in the > webhelpers. Hmm, I'll sleep on that.
The implementations can be in Paginate or a JSPaginate subclass, as long as it's obvious to somebody reading the source that the Javascript code is never executed unless special options have been passed to enable it. Either implementations or examples are fine. What we don't want to do is force users to reinvent the wheel and guess how do to it: we should tell them exactly what to do, where to download the library from, etc. -- Mike Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
