On Feb 19, 12:21 am, "Bob Ippolito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm curious as to why anyone would want to use FastCGI in the first
> place if proxying is available? Implementation wise, there's very
> little reason why FastCGI would be markedly faster or slower than the
> HTTP protocol.
May be due to lack of appropriate knowledge?
For instance, official Pylons deployment docs talks about FastCGI plus
Apache option only. Pylons wiki lists more deployment option but I am
not sure whether it covers proxying setup either (I am not sure what
is this really).
Max.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
