On 4/12/07, Ben Bangert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Apr 12, 2007, at 3:24 PM, Mike Orr wrote: > > > I found two use cases where it would be nice to postprocess the > > Response object in the base controller: > > There was a ticket to add something like this too: > http://pylonshq.com/project/pylonshq/ticket/201 > > So that the Response object is available in __after__ for post- > processing. Would that work?
That would be OK as long as self.response is always a Response and not a string. -- Mike Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
