On 4/22/07, Graham Higgins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > On 20 Apr 2007, at 02:28, Heather wrote: > > > So, any takers? > > Okay, I'll give it a shot. See http://bel-epa.com/wiki/ > AnOverviewOfPylons > > Dunno about acting as groundwork but if it helps you put a couple of > the pieces into place, that's good enough. > > Do let me know if any of it appears especially inarticulate or > confusing.
It looks nice, but I fear so many people have written overviews of Pylons that I'm completely losing track. I have copies of "Concepts of Pylons" and "Pylons Quick Site" on my desktop. I have a bookmark for all of Mike's stuff. There's the old wiki and the new wiki, not to mention the actual Pylons Web site. I know programmers love to complain about lack of documentation. However, in some cases, I don't think it has to do with lack of volume as much as lack of organization. There's *tons* of good documentation for Pylons. It's just hard to know how to approach it all. I wonder how it might be possible to unify all this documentation and make sure it stays both up to date and easy to find. Of course, the instant reaction to unifying documentation is to write more documentation, which just compounds the issue ;) We need to unify, *delete*, and make a plan for maintaining it. Ok, sorry for the rant :-/ -jj -- http://jjinux.blogspot.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
