On 5/26/07, rahul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the info. > > I went out and used mod_fcgid and it worked flawlessly. > > I didn't think that paster serve being served behind apache was the > perferred choice, as I automatically assumed that it is intended for > development purpose as django's is. Now that being said, scince I have > a working mod_fcgid running already, and setting up psater serve > behind apache isn't much of a problem - is paster serve really much > better than apache performance wise?
There was a big discussion about this a month or two ago. Someone whose name current escapes me (so sorry!) did a big comparison and found that paster performed as well or better, and it was a lot easier to deal with. It's not like Django's server. I've been using it in production for months. Happy Hacking! -jj -- http://jjinux.blogspot.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
