On 8/17/07, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > im -1 on the "model.XXXX" prefix too. proper imports should be used > so that this isn't needed.
"proper imports" returns the "session"-and-"Session"-in-the-same-namespace problem, though. By the way, the capital "Session" still irks me. Sure, it's a (constructed) class, but it's being treated as a (non-class) object, and I don't see how using Session is any semantically different to how we use a StackedObjectProxy or any other sort of proxy/facade. Implementation details don't seem as important as how it feels to use it. Anyway, we're back to a namespace collision (even if only in people's heads) if we're expecting people to get used to having "Session" and "session" both in scope. Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner http://nxsy.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
