On Sep 2, 1:32 pm, Philip Jenvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sep 1, 2007, at 8:47 PM, Qiangning Hong wrote: > > > > > nose-0.10.0b1 is out for dozens of days. Should pylons be adapted to > > compatible with it? > > Have you tried b1 with Pylons? Does it work well? > > The first alpha release was pretty buggy, and wasn't working with a > fairly basic Pylons project nor the actual Pylons tests, that's why > we restricted the versions to < 0.10.
I'd recommend sticking with a requirement of <= 0.9.9 until nose 0.10.0 final is out. The pre-releases are pre-releases because ... well, you know. :) But I'd also ask, if you find a (pre- or otherwise) release of nose is buggy, please report those bugs! I don't see any bugs, open or closed, mentioning Pylons. I remember a couple from Ian Bicking that might be Pylons-related, but I'm just guessing. Certainly I didn't get any reports of 0.10a1 failing with Pylons itself or a basic Pylons project. Nose's bug tracker is here: http://code.google.com/p/python-nose/issues/list Thanks, JP (main author of nose) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
