> DbMechanic aims to totally replace and exceed Catwalk. Chris posted a
> fair wack about it recently on the TG trunk list if you're interested.

The catwalk implementation was pretty difficult to extend and
maintain.   But dbsprockets seems likely to be much easier to
maintain/extend once it gets done.   And it should be reasonably easy
to use it with plain pylons eventually.  The current focus is on
completing back-end features, and making everything work with one DB
backend (SQLAlchemy) and one web frontend (TG2+ToscaWidgets).   But
from what I've seen it's being designed to support alternate backends,
and pylons+toscawidgets should be relitively simple to integrate as a
front end.

--Mark Ramm

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to