Hi Lythoner, > Yes. I have modified sqlalchemy_driver.py file to use SqlAlchemy 0.4.
Actually what I meant was that there is already an SQLAlchemy 0.4 driver in there: http://authkit.org/trac/browser/AuthKit/trunk/authkit/users/sqlalchemy_04_driver.py It uses some experimental middleware I wrote to wrap some of the SQLAlchemy functionality in WSGI middleware - this isn't the recommended approach in Pylons though so you might prefer to use your driver instead. > Do > you have the unit tests for sqlalchemy_driver?. Please spot me the > location, I would give a try. Yes try here: http://authkit.org/trac/browser/AuthKit/trunk/test You run them using nose. I think the command is: nose test/test.py If Trac is temperamental when following the above links just press refresh a few times and it should work. > I am newbie to pylons, sqlalchemy, have > little programming experience in Python itself. Whatever I have done MAY > NOT be correct. I have attached the modified file, which I haven't > given much review. If you give me some comments/suggestions, I love to > do this migration. Thanks for the offer, do you want to take a look at the existing version and see if it meets your needs first? The version I've linked above uses a new experimental version of the API which creates a new Users instance each time it is called. The methods each have access to the WSGI environ so in principle the new API should be a lot more flexible than the old one. We could add your version in too if you are confident it will end up stable? > Sorry, It was SessionContext not SAContext. Ahh, makes more sense. Cheers, James --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
