On Fri, 2007-21-12 at 02:33 -0800, zunzun wrote: > The TG2 trunk posting rate is not very large by my standards, and can > be very interesting. Here is an example where the use of Mako is > rejected in TG and will not be used; > > http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk/browse_thread/thread/aa64ca3c47fba560/1ab45c906bfdc9ef?lnk=gst&q=mako+genshi#1ab45c906bfdc9ef > > James
Hi James, Mako did not get "rejected per se", we all decided not to replace the *default* with Mako. It's just as easy in TG to replace Genshi with Mako as it is in Pylons to replace Mako with Genshi. ( easy! ) And in TG2, all widgets will be able to use Mako out of the box as Toscawidgets comes with Mako and Genshi templates. I personally think this is a good choice that differentiates TG and Pylons proper in the right way. TG2 will add defaults and conveniences on top of raw pylons, making it a good choice where developer time and ease trumps performance and minute control. Where that is not the case, one would probably want to use Mako anyway because it's so darned fast. On the other hand, Genshi is fantastic when one is not concerned with ultra fast rendering. The XML basis of it makes it very very nice for any heavy DOM scripting apps. HTH Iain --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
