On Jan 10, 2008 12:40 PM, Mike Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Routes 2 will have a different configuration syntax and > url_for syntax, but you'll probably be able to use either Routes 2 or > Routes 1 with 0.9.7 if you're happy with your existing routes.
Actually, this would almost work except that Pylons would be depending on a different version of Routes. And unlike WebHelpers, which can be decoupled from Pylons relatively easily, Routes is a large part of what makes Pylons Pylons. The user could reconcile this by hacking Pylons' dependencies in setup.py and/or EGG-INFO and installing into a virtualenv. But they'd have to remember to do this every time they upgrade Pylons. Alternatively, we could re-release the Routes 1.x series as Routes1. Then users could keep old route maps by just changing the import in routing.py. That would work for WebHelpers too (webhelpers_legacy). -- Mike Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
