not wanting to discourage other authors, but don't you think that the
solution posted above is quite heavy and almost a bit black-magical?
don't you think it is quite hard to read & relies a bit too heavily on
implementation details? when all that this code achieves (assuming it
does) is something you are IMHO much better off *avoiding* to do in
the first place? see my original response to the OP for considerations
about how to avoid the issue of 'cross-calling controller code'
altogether.

in short: you shouldn't be doing that, it's not the way to go. calling
controller A from controller B is * too hard to do in pylons, * not
especially useful, * of doubtful (architectural) merit.

you can do what you want without allowing another brittle code beast
into your application by doing a simple refatoring of code. maybe you
can argue it should be posssible, maybe other frameworks make it
painless. but should you resort to throwing a hog like the one posted
at this problem? i doubt it.

_wolf




--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to