Hi Jorge,

> seriously please consider the argument. your wiki homepage says django
> 3 times and it doesn't even has a link to pylons. From a quick look
> the only thing it has in comming with pylons is that they both use
> paste, which as you know using paste is normally using less than 10%
> of it's tools.
>
> So as Ben said, if you guys at least have some examples on how to use
> your django toolkit on top of pylons (or at least a list of reasons
> why it could be a good idea) then this post doesn't belongs here.

I know that my wiki page suck. I have very little budget and
resources. notmm
is not funded in any ways, and doesn't make the news quite often.

But I like working and contributing to open source projects. Despite
this, I've found
that raising a open source project from scratch can be painful. Bigger
projects
attracts larger pools or developers and  therefore are more easily
visible, gets more
funding, and so forth.

So, if bigger projects like Pylons or Django don't even let smaller
embryonic projects evolves,
I can understand very well why theses projects are so popular, and
lesser known projects
gets very little visibility.

Sorry about the wiki page. I'll try to write something on Pylons
shortly.

Thanks,
Etienne

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to