On May 29, 8:07 am, "Alberto Valverde" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhaps a trip to archives [1] to refresh your memory on the tone of some > of your posts can shed a light on the reason you felt treated in this way > by TG's dev. community.
Perhaps my tone got increasingly negative as a response to poor treatment. I constantly created patches to bring TG's SqlAlchemy support in line with the SqlObject -- as one was supported and another was 'experiemental'. I would then be derided for trying to instill new design patterns -- which were exact clones of Kevin's 'official' sqlobject work. On top of that, every bit of new functionality I offered and coded to the TG community as a patch set was summarily rejected... then 2-8 months later I would receive an email saying "So we realized that we should have gone in this direction... would you mind updating your patch to the new codebase?" --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
