Thanks, all

I didn't know that by just decompiling bytecode, the source code could
be easily derived

Will this fact be a limitation for Python apps on embedded systems? I
think source code protection seems to be a great concern when
deploying apps on embedded systems.


On 7月4日, 上午9時40分, "Shannon -jj Behrens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the past, I worked at a company that stored all Python encrypted in
> a Berkeley DB and then used a custom import hook to get at it.
>
> -jj
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Dean Landolt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You do realize it's trivial to decompile python bytecode, right?
>
> > If you're that worried about your IP, don't code in python. Of course, given
> > enough effort you can pretty much decompile anything. So if you're that
> > worried, perhaps you shouldn't distribute that code at all -- just provide a
> > web service.
>
> > On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 7:05 AM, phlee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Hi, all
>
> >> Is it possible to distribute a Pylons app in which only .pyc (or .pyo)
> >> files are included?
>
> >> If not, can I just say web2py is currently the only Python web
> >> framework supporting bytecode distribution?
>
> --
> It's a walled garden, but the flowers sure are 
> lovely!http://jjinux.blogspot.com/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to