and users can easily concatenate the query string to the url by themselves, so not much point to allow that option. I like the params dict suggestion.
On Jan 5, 12:11 pm, Wyatt Baldwin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jan 5, 11:57 am, "Mike Orr" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Wyatt Baldwin > > > [snip] > > > > Actually, I think I like the idea of making the query params into a > > > single argument. It could be a string like a=1&b=2 or a dict. > > > No! Encouraging the user to do their own interpolation and escaping > > would be a step back into the Dark Ages. > > Sorry if I'm being daft, but you're only vehemently (!) opposing > ``params`` as a *string*, correct? > > I see your point there, and I can't think of a case where I'd need or > want to use a str instead of a dict--except maybe where the query > string came from elsewhere, but that seems like a fairly unusual case. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
